Nerdasm | The Climax of Geeky Excitement

The U.S. Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency funds a research project it calls Global Autonomous Language Exploitation (GALE). GALE is allowing companies like Dial Direct and Sakhr Software to produce software for smart phones that would allow you to communicate anywhere in the world, without years of language class. Here is a demo of their really neat translation app for the iPhone.

The languages that the government is focusing on are Arabic and Chinese, so that’s where the development is now, but once the ground work is laid it ought to be pretty easy to port of out to other languages, especially since Arabic and Chinese are two of the harder ones for English speaking people. The government is testing both speech to text and text to text translation (I guess they figure once you have the translation saying it is pretty eays) and they want 95% of a fluent humans “edit-distance” before this project is considered a success. Edit-distance is “The number of edits (modifications) that someone needs to make to the output of a machine translation system such that the resulting text is fluent English and completely captures the meaning of the gold standard reference.” They are using a few other methods to test the products automatically until they start to reach that 95% threshold but I don’t see any real need to bog you down with any more definitions that necessary.

The last published test of potential software was completed over January and February of 2008. The published results don’t look too promising. The leading scores in each category are as follows (score listed is BLUE-4 look in the link for more data on it but possible scores are between 0 and 1, 1 is perfect translation)

  • Arabic to English: 0.4557
  • Chinese to English: 0.3089
  • English to Chinese: 0.4142

Those aren’t that inspiring, but they are and year and a half old (the results for 09 won’t be released till October 30th). The demo video shows just how far they have been able to come in that time. I don’t speak Arabic at all, so I don’t know how good the English to Arabic translation was, but the Arabic to English made perfect sense (yes granted it was one rather simple sentence, but hey what can you do). Just think in the near future you may actually be able to turn your smartphone into a business tool and not just a mobile gaming platform.

As usual Links and such:

NIST 2008 Official Results: http://www.itl.nist.gov/iad/mig/tests/mt/2008/doc/mt08_official_results_v0.html

General Info about the GALE project: http://www.itl.nist.gov/iad/mig/tests/gale/

Sakhr website (not very useful): http://www.sakhrusa.com/arabic-machine-translation-MT.html

, , , , , , , , Hide

ATI, owned by AMD, has come out with a fantastic SDK that allows developers to port floating point operations and basic number computation to the highly suited Radeon GPU. These GPUs operate in a very parallel nature, the acronym they use is SIMD (single instruction, multiple data items). The point being that if you need to do a single operation to a large array (say matrix multiplication on two matrices of size 12 x 10 and 9 x 15 for instance) why do that on your logic based single, dual, quad, or if your really on the bleeding edge octo core CPU system, when you can do the same thing on you GPU that will do it with tens, hundreds, or on the real high end stuff thousands of parallel threads. The performance gains become pretty obvious to see when you compare a single digit number of threads to the tremendous power of GPU arithmetic computation.

The basis of the SDK falls on Brook+, an extension of the C programing language developed by Stanford University to give easier access to CPU GPU level operations. What AMD is distributing is basically a compiler for a language made specifically to boil relatively complex arithmetic operations down into simple instructions (referred to as kernels) that can be executed in parallel on the GPU. This then utilizes the “compute abstraction layer” (CAL) which is basically hiding all of the GPU specific instructions, so that the developer only has to learn C/C++ and the additions brought by Brook+, and not ATI’s proprietary instruction language as well (something they probably don’t want to release anyway).

To anyone that has spent much time looking into Microsoft’s .NET development environment this all starts to sound pretty familiar, a complex base that is simplified to increase usability and portability across development environments, but the one thing that I haven’t talked about yet that .NET and ATI Stream depend upon is intermediate language, the last layer of programming that AMD is giving developers access to with their SDK. This is also the realm that will be occupied solely by the masochistic type of people that have to try and get two more megaflops out out their GPU when you’re already talking about gigaflops, but since AMD had to develop this language to make everything work to begin with I guess it doesn’t hurt for them to release it to the public.

So I’ve thrown out some jargon and tried at least to make it sound like I know what the hell I’m talking about, but what does this really mean to the average user? Well that depends on how often you do a large amount of similar arithmetic calculations. If you don’t think you do any then you’re probably wrong. A plug in exists today to make Adobe Premier CS4 significantly faster because encoding video requires a ton of arithmetic operations. In fact pretty much all of the CS 4 creative suite could benefit from Stream processing. Also converting video for play on mobile devices is good use that I see in the near future. Accounting software, especially the type used for corporate taxes, could see an advantage if you’re talking about a lot of tax files. I could go on, but really the only limit to the realm of usefulness of this technology is the developers willingness to utilize the SDK. Hopefully this will go along with multi threading and become a very standard thing for programs that can see a performance boost out of it.

Linky goodness:

AMD/ATI Stream Computing FAQ’s: http://forums.amd.com/devforum/messageview.cfm?catid=328&threadid=95060&enterthread=y

AMD authored whitepaper: http://ati.amd.com/technology/streamcomputing/firestream-sdk-whitepaper.pdf

Stream Computing Overview: http://developer.amd.com/gpu_assets/Stream_Computing_Overview.pdf

More information on Brook+ that you could ever want: http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/brookgpu/brookgpu.pdf

, , , , , , , , , Hide

This isn’t a new technology, but hey I never nailed myself to the bleeding edge. The designers at Art. Lebedev Studios have brought the world the Optimus Maximus fully programmable keyboard:

Optimus Maximus Keyboard

By fully programmable I don’t mean you have a few macro keys and you can reprogram other keys if you can remember what the hell you changed them to do. This is a keyboard where all 103 standard keys can be changed to any 256 or less character string. AND they give you ten 10 keys to program whatever you want into. It you want to go from QWERTY to Dvorak not a problem, load the profile from the on board SD card, Arabic characters, load the profile. They even have the software to changes the keys as you load up Half-Life, or Photoshop, or any other program you wish.

All that fails to compare to what really makes this keyboard what it is, on the top end version all 113 keys have a 48 x 48 pixel OLED display on them. What could you so with 48 x 48 pixels and over 65 thousand colors per key. Oh yah and it can handle animated gifs too. The possibilities (beyond normal typing cause who spends $1,600 for what a $20 keyboard could do) are endless, but I really want to see some kind of simple movie displayed on one of these, now I just have to be able to afford one. None the less these are pretty awesome and you should go look at them at Art. Lebedev Studios Optimus Keyboard Page

, , Hide

« Previous Page« Previous Entries

Next Entries »Next Page »

Find it!

Theme Design by devolux.org

The thoughts and ideas expressed here are mine and mine alone, if you'd like to share them please cite me